Your web users comes in all shapes and sizes, and your web testing should totally accommodate this diversity. They can browse your website on:
Together, they create about 63000+ possible browser - device - OS combinations that testers must consider when performing web testing.
This is why cross-browser testing is so crucial.
Cross-browser testing is a type of testing where testers assess the compatibility and functionality of a website across various browsers, operating systems, and their versions.
Cross-browser testing rose from the inherent differences in popular web browsers (such as Chrome, Firefox, or Safari) in terms of their rendering engines, HTML/CSS support, JavaScript interpretation, and performance characteristics, leading to inconsistencies in user experience.
The end goal of cross browser testing is to eliminate inconsistency and bring a standardized experience to users, no matter what browsers the users choose to access their website/web application.
There are many ways browsers can impact the web experience:
There are many potential issues that can occur without cross browser testing. Below are some examples of them, and it could be happening without you knowing:
All of these issues call for cross-browser testing.
The QA team needs to prepare the list of items they want to check in their cross browser compatibility testing.
Choosing the right browsers, versions, and platforms for testing can be tricky for testers, especially since they often don’t have access to the necessary data. Instead, this decision is usually made by the client, business analysis, and marketing teams.
Companies gather usage and traffic data to figure out the most popular browsers, devices, and environments. The testing team advises during this phase and begins testing the application once the choices are finalized.
After testing, any defects found are shared with the design and development teams, who then fix issues with the visuals or code as needed.
Cross-browser testing should be done:
The cross browser testing and bug fixing workflow for a project can be roughly divided into 6 following phases (which is in fact the STLC that can be applied to any type of testing):
1. Requirement Analysis
2. Test Planning
3. Environment Setup
4. Test Case Development
5. Test Execution
6. Test Cycle Closure
During the planning phase, discussions with the client or business analyst help define what needs to be tested. A test plan outlines the testing requirements, available resources, and schedules. While testing the entire application on all browsers is ideal, time and cost limitations make it more practical to test 100% of the application on one major browser and focus only on critical features for other browsers.
Next, analyze the target audience's browsing habits, devices, and other factors. Use data from client analytics, competitor statistics, or geographic trends to determine key testing platforms.
For example, an eCommerce site targeting North American customers might:
Once testing platforms are identified, revisit the feature requirements and technology choices in the test plan.
Manual testing involves testers accessing websites through various browsers and manually performing test cases to identify bugs. While straightforward, it is time-consuming, prone to errors, and not scalable for repetitive tasks.
Automated testing uses tools to create and run test cases, improving efficiency, accuracy, and consistency. Teams can either build an in-house tool or buy one from a vendor. A good cross-browser testing tool should:
Automate repetitive tests and use manual testing for ad-hoc, exploratory, and usability tests.
Setting up a test environment is challenging and expensive if using physical machines. Testers would need various devices (Windows PC, Mac, Linux, iPhone, Android devices, tablets) along with older versions of these systems. Managing test cases and results across such devices is difficult without a centralized system.
Common solutions include:
For manual testing, testers can use AI-powered test case generation in Katalon with JIRA integration. With ChatGPT, creating well-structured and accurate test cases becomes easier through natural language inputs, saving time and reducing manual effort.
After integrating Katalon with JIRA, installing the "Katalon - Test Automation for JIRA" plugin, and setting up the API key, a "Katalon manual test cases" button will appear in JIRA tickets. Clicking this button allows the Katalon Manual Test Case Generator to analyze the ticket title and description, then automatically create detailed manual test cases for you.
As you can see below, Katalon has generated 10 manual test cases for you within seconds, and you can easily save these test cases to the Katalon Test Management system, which helps you track their status in real-time.
For automation testing, you can leverage the Built-in Keywords and Record-and-Playback. The Built-in keywords are essentially prewritten code snippets that you can drag and drop to structure a full test case without having to write any code, while the Record-and-Playback simply records the actions on your screen and then turns those actions into an automated test script which you can re-execute on any browsers or devices you want.
If testers go for manual testing, they can simply open the browser and run the tests they have planned out, then record the results manually. If they choose automation testing, they can configure the environment they want to execute on then run the tests. In Katalon TestCloud, after constructing a test script, testers can easily select the specific combination they want to run the tests on.
Finally, testers return the results for the development and design team to start troubleshooting. After the development team has fixed the bug, the testing team must re-execute their tests to confirm that the bug has indeed been fixed. These results should be carefully documented for future reference and analysis.
Try Cross Browser Testing With Katalon Free Trial
Analyze your audience’s browsing habits using tools like Google Analytics or similar traffic analysis platforms. Focus on the most commonly used browsers, devices, and versions for your target market. Include a mix of modern browsers and older ones if a significant portion of your audience still uses them.
Yes, cross-browser testing can identify issues related to accessibility features, such as screen readers or keyboard navigation, across different browsers. This ensures your website complies with accessibility standards like WCAG and provides an inclusive user experience.
For legacy browsers, focus on testing critical features rather than the entire application. Use tools like BrowserStack or Sauce Labs to simulate older browser environments and ensure basic functionality, especially for applications targeting regions with slower tech adoption.
Responsive design ensures that a website adapts to different screen sizes, while cross-browser testing ensures it works well across different browsers. Both go hand in hand to deliver a consistent user experience on a variety of devices and platforms.
Use cloud-based platforms like LambdaTest or BrowserStack that provide pre-configured environments for multiple browser versions. Automate repetitive test cases for older versions while manually testing unique or complex features.
Yes, tools like Appium, BrowserStack, and Sauce Labs are specifically designed to test mobile browsers. These tools allow you to simulate a variety of devices, operating systems, and browsers for comprehensive testing.
Frequent browser updates can introduce new features or deprecate older ones, potentially breaking your application. To handle this, schedule periodic tests to check compatibility with the latest versions and maintain awareness of browser release schedules.
Yes, some tools like Lighthouse or Katalon integrate performance testing into cross-browser tests. They help identify rendering delays, slow-loading elements, and browser-specific bottlenecks that affect user experience.